Faith or Folly?

For 11 years, parishioners have been occupying a church in Scituate, Massachusetts that was designated for closure by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston. They will end their vigil as they call it on May 29 in accordance with a judge’s final ruling that they vacate the property. The always great Thomas Farragher called it a “Journey of Faith” in a recent column in the Boston Globe. I can’t help but feel it was a colossal waste of energy.

The church was closed because the Archdiocese needed the money to pay for the settlement of the mountain of the child sexual abuse cases revealed by the Globe’s Spotlight team. Reading through some of the news stories over the past 12 years, I learned that parishioners repaired the roof and heating system themselves, in the hope that the church would remain open (note: parishioners have sued to be reimbursed for the $37,000 they say they spent to keep the property up) and that the Archdiocese kept the electricity, heat and water on, and paid for snow removal (which had to have cost a bundle in 2015) for the protestors.

The case had been reviewed by the Massachusetts Superior court, the Apostolic Signatura at the Vatican, appeals court until ultimately the Supreme Court refused to hear the case. And the town of Scituate has sued the church for property taxes, claiming that since they are no longer tax exempt, they need to pay up.

It feels so petty, so incredibly short-sighted and self-absorbed.

I am not religious. If anything I am anti-religion. I do understand faith, however. I was raised in a family of the faithful. My nana went to 9:00 mass every morning. My brothers and I went to parochial school, and there was a stretch of time when I wanted nothing more than to be a nun.

I fail to see how this protest was about faith. This was about a building. And, putting aside my distaste and distrust of organized religion, I cannot figure out how a building was so important to these hundreds of people that they could not find somewhere else to gather and celebrate. There is another parish right in Scituate! They did not even have to leave their small town!

In fact, Jon Rogers, a spokesman for the parishioners, said they plan to start an independent Catholic church, one not affiliated with the archdiocese.

“We are starting an inclusive church that basically welcomes everybody,” Rogers told WBZ radio in Boston. “This is going to be a great opportunity, as it’s a void that the Archdiocese of Boston has left and continues to leave as they close and destroy churches.”

So what was this all about again? Sounds an awful lot like it was about the protestors.

Just think of what all that combined energy could have accomplished. Yes, a building holds memories, and certainly a church can be the site of some of life’s most important moments. But our poor, our sick, our alone are today’s living reminders of the the most fundamental tenet of the faith–treat others as you want to be treated. There are so many ways those less fortunate would have benefited from the same 24/7 attention of hundreds of compassionate Christians that was given to what essentially is an edifice, a structure with four walls and a roof (albeit one that needed repair).

The parishioners have been called “brave” and “dedicated” by those who have attempted similar vigils in other parishes. I just do not see how brave applies. A protestor from Wellesley wrote in the Boston Herald “Vigiling in the service of a just cause has always reminded us of Christ’s assurance: “where two or three are gathered in my name, there am I in their midst.”

My point exactly. I’d love to hear yours.

4 Replies to “Faith or Folly?”

  1. The church is all about real estate; they are one of the top real estate owners in the state of Massachusetts. And why priests cannot get married in the Catholic Church is because the family would inherit the property also known as the church, and the church did not like that.

    Yes the whole thing was a waste of time, energy, and money but if they paid for it and it was their time and energy do we really care?

    1. Right. I guess I do care because I feel like it was such a waste of, not just the protestors’ time and money, but the courts, and the church, and the town and on and on.

  2. I do not want to speak for these folks but I can understand why they may have done and this and think I may have done the same. A parish is like a family and these people felt that this church or building was their home. Furthermore they may have felt betrayed, angry, and disillusioned by what the archdiocese did for decades to their own children. And now the archdiocese is asking for those faithful, innocent mostly likely of any of the crimes perpetrated by the church heirarchy, to give up their “home” of faith to pay for these crimes. While I can see your points about the futility of their vigil, I feel the same visceral response towards my own beloved parish. Maybe they are blinded by faith, but that statement that ” whenever two or more of you are gathered in my name” is appropriate in this case.
    I also see this as a symbol of what may be a fundamental shift in the Catholic Church. People of faith will gather and worship together as a community while
    perhaps discarding the institution and heirarchy that so lost its way….what would Jesus do?.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *